1.27.2005

on why ann coulter sucks, or, someone actually cares about facts...

found this gem by quickiemart on dailykos's blog

"It's rare that the media ever nail Ann Coulter for her obfuscations and misrepresentations but it happened in prime time, in Canada last night. . .Last night, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's excellent investigative news program, "the Fifth Estate," broadcast a one-hour special on the hijacking of the American media by conservative bullies whose knowledge of foreign policy seems to run the gamut from A to B and who tend toward scream-o-ramas in which dissenters are accused of being unpatriotic.

"Of course, it included Coulter who gloated to correspondent Bob McKeown about how her side is "winning and they're loosing." But in the next segment during a rant about how Canada is disloyal for not sending troops to Iraq, Coulter was finally exposed. It just isn't clear from the exchange if she is genuinely confused or purposefully misrepresenting the truth. . .

"Transcript below. (I recorded this from my television last night.)

"Coulter: "Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?"

McKeown interrupts: "Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam."

Coulter: "I don't think that's right."

McKeown: "Canada did not send troops to Vietnam."

Coulter (looking desperate): "Indochina?"

McKeown: "Uh no. Canada ...second World War of course. Korea. Yes. Vietnam No."

Coulter: "I think you're wrong."

McKeown: "No, took a pass on Vietnam."

Coulter: "I think you're wrong."

McKeown: "No, Australia was there, not Canada."

Coulter: "I think Canada sent troops."

McKeown: "No."

Coulter: "Well. I'll get back to you on that."

McKeown tags out in script:

"Coulter never got back to us -- but for the record, like Iraq, Canada sent no troops to Vietnam."


No comments: